Tag Archives: politics

Too Many Rules!

Religion stifles personal freedoms, right? Too many rules. Too much of the thou-shall-not! mentality. If the human race grows up and dispenses with religion and all its suffocating rules, then we can finally be liberated to experience true happiness. So we are led to believe.

The recent trend in our nation has certainly been to omit religious influence in making public policy. Efforts to simply display copies of the Ten Commandments in public schools or government buildings are met with vigorous legal challenges. Obviously, there are forces in our country that wish to expunge all reference to God and religion from public spaces.

Those who crafted the founding documents of the U.S.A. distinguished our nation by promising religious freedom to the people. Citizens are guaranteed protection from State-imposed religious beliefs and practices. This bold stroke of liberty stood in sharp contrast to the generations of religious oppression perpetrated against millions by toxic collusion between corrupt religious and government institutions.

Let the Church be free from State coercion and let the State be free from Church manipulation!

Respect for the distinctive roles of Church and State finds support in the Bible, especially in the teaching of Jesus. When asked about paying taxes, Jesus said that we should give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God. He made a distinction between government and religion. And he exhorted us to give to each its due.

Jesus made no effort to enlist the power of government to advance his spiritual agenda, nor did he use his message as incitement to violent rebellion against oppressive governments. He forbade his disciples from using violence, even to protect his own life.

Proper respect for the different roles of religion and government has long been expressed in our culture by the phrase “Separation of Church and State.” This separation, however, is interpreted in different ways by different groups. Some are more concerned with protecting the Church from the State, others are focused on protecting the State from the Church.

Those who desire a secular culture have found the idea of a separation between Church and State to be useful in promoting their vision for society. They perceive and promote the separation of Church and State as a wall, an impenetrable division that allows no meaningful dialogue or influence between the two. As a result, religion will have no voice in government if they have their way. And they seem to be making progress.

Nevertheless, progress at expelling religious influence from government has had some unpredicted results. First, it is not clear that freedom has been increased. Second, it is certainly not clear that the number of rules has decreased.

Our secular champions for freedom have produced a plethora of rules that encroach on almost every sector of life. They even dictate what pronouns we must use. They demand that we stop using words like “mother” and “father.” They insist that we agree with absurd notions (for example: men can get pregnant and give birth).

They constantly redefine the rules of language. Certain terms are suddenly deemed to be racist or something-phobic. Or you might be labeled a climate denier or an election denier or a birther or another type of ‘bad’ person. If we ask the wrong question, we are a threat to democracy or to science or to some other important institution, thus justifying government to abuse its power and silence our voice.

This often bizarre list of rules expands with alarming rapidity. It also changes arbitrarily. What you could say or do yesterday may be unacceptable today. (And yesterday’s actions are always judged by today’s rules.) Fear of saying or doing the wrong thing becomes its own pathetic prison.

This expansive and unpredictable secular law code makes the Ten Commandments look far more reasonable and sensible!

The Bible says we have a choice. To be free from righteousness (God’s commands) is to become a slave to sin (selfish destructive desires). Conversely, to be free from sin is to be a servant to righteousness. (See Romans 6:15-23).

The attempt to find freedom and meaning by shedding accountability to God is futile. Without God’s standards, there is no real meaning or purpose to our existence. Surprisingly, we find freedom when we choose to serve God. Why? Because God is more than rules and laws. God is love.

God’s love leads us to perfect freedom. How? God’s love does not depend on rules, but on faith. When we simply trust Jesus, we have God’s love. His commands are still helpful, but they are not the basis for earning his love. His love is his gift to any who will receive it by faith in Christ.

The world only loves those who follow its rules. If you don’t believe so, try using the wrong pronoun or asking probing questions about man-made climate change. See how the world responds.

In Galatians 5:1 we read that it is for freedom that Christ set us free. The verse goes on to exhort us not to submit again to a yoke of slavery. Jesus called on the weary and burdened to follow him, taking on his yoke, which is easy, carrying his burden, which is light (see Matthew 11:28-30).

When the world’s ways get too heavy, Jesus is ready to invite us home to God’s love and God’s ways. In him we find rest for our souls.

May the Spirit of God enable us to appreciate and experience God’s freedom to the fullest,

Brother Richard

1 Comment

Filed under Religion

God-Talk In The News

I love it when God is in the news. He has been the subject of news stories a couple of times recently. Both instances are related to the current race for the White House.

After a disastrous showing in his debate against former President Donald Trump, current President Joe Biden faced calls to step down as his party’s nominee to serve as president for the next four years. He refused to give up. He insisted on staying in the race.

In an interview on ABC News just days after the debate, Biden was defiant, rejecting the notion that he should step aside and let someone else run against Trump. Pressed by his interviewer, Biden conceded that if the Lord Almighty told him to quit, he might quit. Might?

President Biden seemed to correct himself a moment later by saying that if the Lord Almighty came down and told him to quit, he would quit. But then he added that the Lord Almighty is not coming down. Hmmm. I took that to mean that he was not expecting God’s advice, nor was he seeking to get God’s advice.

Biden’s statements about the Lord may be confusing, but he introduced God into the public conversation. I always welcome that!

It didn’t take long for God to make the news again. Former President Donald Trump was speaking publicly about surviving an assassin’s bullet by the slimmest of margins. The attempt on his life happened while he was delivering a speech at an outdoor rally. At just the right instant, the former president turned his head and avoided death. The shot came so close to hitting its target that it bloodied Trump’s ear.

As the former president recalled this harrowing experience, he gave credit to God for saving his life. Others spoke about the providence of God or the hand of God’s protection in preserving Trump’s life. The circumstances certainly seemed to go far beyond mere coincidence.

Not everyone was comfortable with such talk. Some people seemed agitated by assertions that God acted on Trump’s behalf. Predictably, they invoked the separation of church and state as support for their criticisms. Their well-worn arguments always seek to silence those who dare to include God in the public dialogue. They imply that God talk is somehow a threat to democracy.

As Baptists, our heritage includes strong support for the separation of church and state. In the formulative stages of our nation, our Baptist forefathers insisted on religious freedom. They believed passionately in the distinctive realms of authority that distinguish religion and government. They worked hard for constitutional guarantees to protect the church from state control and to recognize the legitimate realm of authority granted to the state by God.

But a wise separation of powers does not require a foolish silencing of honest dialogue. Recognizing the legitimate realms of church and state does not force private citizens or government servants to edit their beliefs about the most important subject of all: our Maker and Savior. Separation of church and state should never be used as an excuse to silence the truth.

We live in an age that has been called the ‘cancel culture.’ Some believe that their political opponents should be canceled and excluded from public discourse. Sadly, it seems that a significant number of Americans are having second thoughts about our fundamental liberties: freedom of religion and freedom of speech.

One thing I know for certain: You cannot cancel God. Those who are hostile to God may be able to intimidate people into silence for a while, but God isn’t going away. God-talk isn’t going away. God is big enough to handle our dialogue about him, no matter how difficult the questions may be.

Let’s rejoice when God is in the news. Let’s keep God in the conversation.

May the Lord inspire and enable us to speak the truth with love,

Brother Richard

Leave a comment

Filed under Religion

Don’t Discuss Religion, Politics . . . or Science?

They say you should avoid discussing religion and politics. Why? Because people have strong convictions about these subjects. They can get ‘cranky’ if their convictions are questioned or challenged. You could lose a friend.

Now the subject of science may be taking its place alongside religion and politics. People have strong convictions about science. They have arrived at certain conclusions about how to understand the data which science presents. As with religion and politics, people may get irritable if their interpretations are questioned.

Science is viewed by many as an immovable edifice of truth. Once an idea is embraced by the scientific community, everyone is supposed to bow down and submit, or at least be quiet and not ask questions.

Current events are demonstrating that science may be more like religion than we thought. It turns out that science is subject to political views and ideologies. Data that supports a political ideology is amplified. Data that challenges the ideology is conveniently filed away for further study.

As the current worldwide pandemic unfolds, we can see in real time two irrefutable facts. First, science takes time to get it right. Second, politicians use science to advance their worldview through public policy. And number two happens faster than number one.

True science is careful and methodical. As a result, it sometimes moves too slow to help with pressing public policy issues. Sometimes we must decide now. Incomplete science can create wrong or even harmful public policy decisions.

At the beginning of the current pandemic, ‘scientific’ conclusions and predictions were used to create support for certain public policy decisions/reactions. Some leaders insisted that science would show us “the way.” We could simply follow science and good things were guaranteed to happen.

Some of those early scientific predictions were wildly inaccurate. Why? The science was incomplete. Moreover, converting scientific data into public policy is not a simple formula. Economic shutdowns had terrible unintended consequences that science said nothing about.

This is why we vote for leaders, not scientists. If science were as simple and clear as some people claim, we could send the government home and make policy based on a printout from the lab. That won’t work. We need leaders who understand more than science because we need more than science to live healthy successful lives.

Perhaps one lesson we learn from the pandemic will be about science. Maybe we will learn to adopt a more realistic view of science’s proper place in human experience.

Science has been increasingly elevated to a godlike status by many people. Science gets the final word. Challenging scientific consensus is the new blasphemy. But science is used both for great good and for terrible evil. The common denominator is humanity.

Knowing science is not enough, even when the science is accurate (and especially when it is not!). We must understand humanity. Effective leaders must know people. Knowing people requires more than chemistry and biology.

Science cannot replace our need for politics. Neither can science replace our need for religion. The popular notion that science and religion are in a ‘winner-take-all’ battle is misleading. True science and religion have long co-existed. More than that, science and religion have often worked together. They will continue to do so.

God has blessed us with a physical world that makes sense and with minds to make sense of it. God and his word are a vital part of the human experience. We need not fear speaking the truth with love. Let’s not be afraid to tell the good news!

May God’s Spirit inspire and enable us,

Brother Richard

Leave a comment

Filed under Religion